| Model Number |
250 (+ 19 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Flashers (1864)
|
| Date of Event |
12/25/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to fda for an event that occurred outside of the usa.Haptic damage is indicated as a potential malfunction related to the iol, as covered under the warnings section of the product's instructions for use (ifu).250: pkg-23-021 00 en3.Ms3.150151250251.20220501(t)_15000f, 15100f, 25000f, 25100f.Regarding section h6 - manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending device return and completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event occurred in china damaged haptic after implantation root; broken haptic during use; damaged haptic patient health not impacted problem code: a0414, material split cut or torn iol was explanted on (b)(6) 2023.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event occurred in (b)(6).Damaged haptic after implantation; root; broken haptic during use; damaged haptic; patient health not impacted; problem code: a0414, material split cut or torn; iol was explanted on (b)(6) 2023.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable event that occurred outside the usa.The report includes corrected and additional information not available/included in the initial report.Corrected information: h3 - corrected to yes.Additional information: g6 - type of report - noted as follow-up #1.H2 - type of follow-up - noted for additional information.H6 - added codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.The product was returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.Appearance check result was consistent to reported information.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.(serial no.: "(b)(6)" ; model: "250").The dye test result showed the injector tip was properly coated.The lens release test result showed that the re-installed new iol could be released out of the returned injector without any problems.From our investigation, we confirmed the reported event.The exact root cause was not determined.However, based on the available information and our investigation, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|