|
Section a2, a4, and a5: unknown; requested but not provided.Section b3: date of event: unknown; requested but not provided.The best estimate date is prior to (b)(6) 2024.Section d4: model number: unknown; requested but not provided.Section d4: serial number: unknown; requested but not provided.Section d4: catalog number: a complete catalog number is unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d4: expiration date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d4: unique identifier (udi) number: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section h3 - other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation and the serial number for this device is unknown/not provided; therefore, no further product investigation can be performed.Should any further relevant information become available a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h4: device manufacture date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Additional information: through follow-up, it was reported that the lens would not deploy and insert correctly.It is also noted that the patient moved upon insertion and a second lens was used.The lens was fully inserted in the left eye and then removed and replaced during the same procedure.No incision enlargement or vitrectomy was required.The patient did not seek medical attention or was prescribed any medications outside of the standard of care.There was a 10-minute delay in procedure.Event date was (b)(6) 2024.The patient was discharged.The device model and serial number, patient gender, date of birth and age, race, weight, and the surgeon¿s name and phone number were also provided.No further information was provided.Correction: based on the additional information received, there is no indication that the lens was damaged, as initially reported, therefore, section h6: medical device problem code 1069 ¿ break, is no longer applicable.Based on the additional information received, multiple fields are being corrected from what was reported on the initial report.Therefore, this supplemental report is capturing this new and corrected information.The following fields have been updated/corrected accordingly: section a2: date of birth: (b)(6) 1945.Section a2: age: 78 years.Section a3: gender: female.Section a4: patient weight: 166 pounds.Section a5: ethnicity: not hispanic/latino.Section a5: race: white.Section b3: date of event: (b)(6)2024.Section d1: brand name: tecnis iol.Section d4: model number: zcu300.Section d4: catalog number: zcu300u215.Section d4: serial number: (b)(6).Section d4: expiration date: jul 18, 2026.Section d4: unique identifier (udi) number: (b)(4).Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d11: concomitant medical product: 1mtec30, cm36311 section e1: title: dr.(b)(6).Section e1: first name: (b)(6).Section e1: last name: (b)(6).Section e1: phone number: (b)(6).Section e2: health professional?: yes.Section e3: occupation: physician.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Section h4: device manufacture date: jul 18, 2021.Section h6: health effect - impact code 4631 ¿ more complex surgery.Section h6: health effect - impact code 4632 ¿ prolonged surgery.Section h6: health effect - clinical code 4582 ¿ no clinical signs, symptoms or conditions.Section h6: medical device problem code 4009 ¿ ejection problem.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed, and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no similar complaints for this production order number have been received.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|