|
It was reported that, after a thr had been performed on an unknown date, the patient fell and the unipolar head disassociated from the sleeve.A revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2024 to address this adverse event.The tandem unipolar 51mm and the tandem uni 12/14 tpr slv + 4 were removed and replaced.Patients' current health status in unknown.
|
|
The associated device was returned and evaluated.The visual inspection concluded that no damage was able to be detected by naked eye.However, the clinical/medical investigation concluded that, the provided x-ray was reviewed and confirms the disassociation as the femoral head is outside of the acetabulum and separated from the femoral stem.All images provided as of this date have been reviewed and considered and unless noted do not contribute to the clinical/medical investigation.The patient fall is likely the clinical root cause of the implant disassociation and subsequent revision.The patient impact is the revision and post operative convalescence period.No further clinical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for endoprostheses systems revealed in precautions that the correct selection of the neck length and stem positioning are extremely important.Muscle laxity and/or malpositioning of components may result in subluxation or dislocation of the implants.Additionally, revealed that dislocations and subluxations have been identified as adverse effects.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include traumatic injury, patient condition, size selected or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|