• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT MRI 8GS, INT. W SP, ATT S/L; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT MRI 8GS, INT. W SP, ATT S/L; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1878000
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/31/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the catheter was allegedly fractured.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were not provided.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fracture, as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional information was received, and the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as serious injury.H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.The medical record states that the implantable port was implanted to a patient for the treatment of malignant melanoma and the port was placed after right axillary lymph node dissection.The port placement procedure was undertaken with the help of ultrasound guidance, a large bore needle was accessed in left jugular vein, the guide wire was threaded down the needle towards the heart.A port pocket was created by incision over the skin at the left side of the chest, and the catheter was tunneled from the neck to chest wall.Further, the catheter was trimmed to its appropriate length and attached to the port.The placed port was sutured to the chest wall.Finally, the implanted port was flushed, aspirated, and cleaned.Fluoroscopy confirms the position of port and catheter without any sharp bend.Approximately after three years and four months later, an chest x-ray was performed to check the status of the implanted port, it was observed that the catheter fragment was within the right ventricle.However, the previous radiography which was taken after three years and two months later of post implant showed that the port and catheter were located in satisfactory position.After a week of chest x-ray taken, the port removal procedure was undertaken with the help of ultrasound and fluoroscopic guidance, foreign body removal at the right jugular vein.The guide wire was advanced at the level of inferior vena cava, the transitional catheter and stylet was removed.Through the sheath in ensnare device, the fragmented catheter was snared and removed through the dermatotomy site.A final image demonstrates there is no radiopaque foreign body left behind within the neck and chest.As the medical record confirms the evidence, catheter fracture, catheter separation and catheter migration, therefore the investigation confirms the same for the reported events.Furthermore, the clinical condition alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 03/2023).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the litigation process that three years, five months, and eight days post a port placement via the left internal jugular vein, the catheter was allegedly fractured.It was further reported that the fractured catheter fragment had allegedly migrated within the patient's right ventricle.Reportedly, the retained portion of the fractured catheter fragment was retrieved with a snare device.The current status of the patient is unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT MRI 8GS, INT. W SP, ATT S/L
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key18835620
Report Number3006260740-2024-00915
Device Sequence Number7227023
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027246
UDI-Public(01)00801741027246
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K063377
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2020
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Consumer,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/21/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number1878000
Device Lot NumberREDY3929
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/14/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/19/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/05/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-