|
Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes), there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual/microscopic inspection, the main coil was seen to be broken fractured just at the detachment zone with partial coil still attached.There were no other anomalies noted to the device.During functional inspection, main coil prematurely detached/separated during use functional test was not confirmed.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.The reported main coil prematurely detached/separated during use was not confirmed during analysis.The device failed to meet specifications when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.The device was prepared for use as per the dfu.There was no damage noted to the packaging prior to opening the packaging.Continued flush was maintained throughout the procedure.The patient¿s anatomy was normal.During analysis, the main coil was seen to be broken/fractured just after the detachment zone with partial coil still attached.An assignable cause of ¿not confirmed¿ will be assigned to the as reported ¿main coil prematurely detached/separated during use¿, as the main coil was still partially attached along with the detachment zone.An assignable cause of ¿procedural factors¿ will be assigned to the as analyzed ¿main coil broken/fractured during use¿ these defects appears to be associated with a product that met stryker design and manufacturing specifications and was used in accordance with the dfu, but performance was limited due to procedural factors during use.
|