• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; SMART PORT CT SINGLE TITANIUM PORT SYSTEM WITH ATTACHABLE 8.0F X 66CM POLYURETHA

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ANGIODYNAMICS, INC SMART PORT CT; SMART PORT CT SINGLE TITANIUM PORT SYSTEM WITH ATTACHABLE 8.0F X 66CM POLYURETHA Back to Search Results
Catalog Number H787CT80STPD0
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/09/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported defective device has been received by the manufacturer for a device evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for product problem is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.Reference (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
An angiodynamics senior clinical specialist reported an issue with a single titanium ct vtx port w poly cath.It was reported that a port catheter fracture was discovered during port removal and the fractured segment remains in the patient.The surgeon determined that the fragment will remain in situ and the patient has not experienced any adverse effects or harm as a result of this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The customer's reported complaint description of catheter tubing fractured and detached is confirmed.The catheter tubing was inspected and found to be within specification for catheter id and od.The catheter was trimmed and assembled at 18 cm.The fracture occurred around the 10 cm mark.Based on the location of the fracture from the port (~8cm) and the worn (missing) print/oval nature of the fracture, the likely root cause is pinch-off syndrome.As observed in the returned catheter tubing longitudinal fractures may occur.The printing of the catheter was also worn off at the fracture site, indicating flex failure.The rest of the catheter was found to be normal in appearance and measured within specification.Device history record review of the packaging/assembly/component lots revealed no quality related issues or manufacturing deficiencies at the time of manufacture.Labeling review: the instructions for use item number {16608102-01}, which is supplied to the user with this item number, contains the following statements: - absence of a blood return or a poor blood return can be a sign of a potential complication such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, fibrin formation, thrombosis or malposition.This should be evaluated prior to device usage.A blood return should be present prior to usage of device for any therapy or testing.- if the patient complains of pain, or if there is swelling when the device is flushed or when medication or contrast media is administered, evaluate the device for infiltration, proper needle placement, and potential complications such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, thrombosis or malposition.Failure to assess these complaints or observations can lead to device failure.Caution: avoid piercing catheter with suture needle.Potential complications: catheter fragmentation and catheter pinch-off.Catheter placement considerations: warning: avoid medial catheter placement into subclavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.Pinch-off syndrome: pinch-off syndrome signs may include difficulty in aspirating blood, resistance to flushing or infusion of medications or fluids that improves with position changes, infraclavicular pain and/or swelling with catheter flushing or infusion palpitations, sudden onset chest pain, cardiac arrhythmias, extra heart sound, chest wall swelling at the port pocket, vein insertion site, pain in shoulder or port area not associated with swelling, cough, paresthesia of arm on side of catheter withdrawal occlusion or swishing sound with catheter flushing.Warning: avoid medial catheter placement into subclavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.Note: if infusion or aspiration is successful upon lifting arm above the head and turning the head, consider pinch-off syndrome as a possible cause.The line should be radiologically evaluated if pinch-off syndrome is suspected.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Reference pr(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMART PORT CT
Common Device Name
SMART PORT CT SINGLE TITANIUM PORT SYSTEM WITH ATTACHABLE 8.0F X 66CM POLYURETHA
Manufacturer (Section D)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIODYNAMICS, INC
10 glens falls technical park
glens falls NY 12801
Manufacturer Contact
alexandra invencio
26 forest street
marlborough, MA 01752
5086587990
MDR Report Key18846560
Report Number1317056-2024-00043
Device Sequence Number7757866
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device IdentifierH787CT80STPD0
UDI-PublicH787CT80STPD0
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K062414
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/23/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2025
Device Catalogue NumberH787CT80STPD0
Device Lot Number5732867
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/20/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/12/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/22/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/06/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/23/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/04/2022
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-