| Catalog Number |
72204046 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/13/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during an arthroscopy, the retrograde drill was introduced to make the tunnel, it was evident that the motor was rotating, but the tip of the drill bit did not, after being inspected, it was noted that the drill bit was damaged.Surgery was completed with a back-up device instead.There was a delay greater than 30 minutes and no further complications were reported.Patient's status is stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: a device deficiency was not identified, and the root cause of the reported event could not be determined since the device was not returned for evaluation.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.Please refer to the instructions for use for precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, during an arthroscopy, the retrograde drill was introduced to make the tunnel, it was evident that the motor was rotating, but the tip of the drill bit did not; both cortices were crossed and when doing the retrograde part, the blade came out and the implant made a sound.The blade was removed to check and it was evident that the blade came loose.Surgery was completed with a back-up device instead.There was a delay greater than 30 minutes and no further complications were reported.Patient's status is stable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H2: additional information b5 h11: h2: corrected information h6: medical device problem code.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).The reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The actuator wire is broken into several pieces, none of which are attached to the grey slider.The drills at the distal end of the shaft are fractured off the shaft.A functional assessment of the device found it is not functional due to being broken into several discrete pieces.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A clinical review states the provided videos were reviewed; however, they do not indicate a cause of the reported event.All documents and images provided as of this date have been reviewed and considered and unless noted do not contribute to the clinical/medical investigation.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device or an impact event inconsistent with normal use.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|