• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER GMBH DISTAL LATERAL FIBULA PLATE, 3 HOLE, STERILE; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER GMBH DISTAL LATERAL FIBULA PLATE, 3 HOLE, STERILE; APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 40-20903S
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Fragmentation (1261); Naturally Worn (2988)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/14/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported: "orif was performed for left distal fibula fracture (primary surgery date is unknown).During the bariatric fibula explanting surgery on (b)(6) 2024, something like metal shavings came out while removing the bone surrounding the screw head." no further information has been provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon completion of the investigation, additional information will be provided in a supplemental report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction - please refer to d2a, d2b, g1 manufacturing site for devices, h6 device code.The reported event could not be confirmed during the inspection performed.The device inspection revealed the following: the identification of the returned plate was confirmed based on the catalog # and lot # marked.Multiple scratches were observed on the implant's surface and on the holes.The first ones occurred most probably during the implantation and explantation.The later are most probably a direct result of screw insertion.Four holes indicate possible over torque, being highly worn out and partially deformed.It is also likely that the screws were inserted with an angulation outside of the range advised (-15° to 15°).However, despite the damage observed, there is no clear indication of material fragmentation from the plate.Pictures taken during the explantation were received for inspection and confirm the observations made during the device's inspection.As a reminder, the operative technique clearly states that: "during bone screw insertion in an oblong hole, the surgeon should rely on tactile feedback to prevent excessive torque which may result in thread / bone stripping, screw damage / pull through, or screwdriver damage.Proper observation of bone quality, screw size and instrumentation can help determine the appropriate insertion torque during insertion and final tightening of the screw in the plate.When the screw is fully seated during final tightening, an increase of resistance indicates sufficient screw fixation.¿ the instructions for use clearly state that: ¿ when engaging a screwdriver blade within a screw head, the blade must be fully seated within the head of the screw.Placement of all screws requires the use of a dedicated drill guide to ensure proper screw placement.If a drill guide is not used, the plate may be damaged, and the screw may not lock into the plate.¿ excessive tightening of the variax¿ foot locking screw may lead to titanium particle generation.Particles must be removed to prevent potential contamination causing inflammation.¿ the angle of the inserted variax¿ foot locking screw must not exceed 15°".Based on investigation, the root cause was attributed to an user related issue.The failure was most probably caused by over torque applied during the locking screws insertion, possibly with an unadvised angulation.Nonetheless, as aforementioned, there is no indication of material fragmentation from the plate.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.If more information is provided, the case will be reassessed.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported: "orif was performed for left distal fibula fracture (primary surgery date is unknown).During the bariatric fibula explanting surgery on (b)(6) 2024, something like metal shavings came out while removing the bone surrounding the screw head." no further information has been provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISTAL LATERAL FIBULA PLATE, 3 HOLE, STERILE
Common Device Name
APPLIANCE, FIXATION, NAIL/BLADE/PLATE COMBINATION, MULTIPLE COMPONENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER GMBH
bohnackerweg 1
postfach
selzach 2545
SZ  2545
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER LEIBINGER FREIBURG
boetzingerstr. 41
postfach
freiburg D-791 11
GM   D-79111
Manufacturer Contact
anna jusinski
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key18883892
Report Number0008031020-2024-00118
Device Sequence Number3088914
Product Code KTT
UDI-Device Identifier04546540604613
UDI-Public04546540604613
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K081284
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/15/2024
2 Devices were Involved in the Event: 1   2  
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number40-20903S
Device Lot Number1000497926
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/15/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/18/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/12/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/19/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexPrefer Not To Disclose
-
-