• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS MEXICO IMPRESS®.BRAIDED CATHETER; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS MEXICO IMPRESS®.BRAIDED CATHETER; CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 56538MW2/JPB
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Material Separation (1562)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/06/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device is expected to return for evaluation.A follow-up report will be submitted once the evaluation is complete.
 
Event or Problem Description
The account alleges that during an angiography the catheter tip detached.The product was attempted to be used for internal iliac artery in relation to a type ii endoleak.The catheter was inserted from right femoral artery and delivered through aortic bifurcation to left side.When angiography was performed with the unit at the vicinity of left internal iliac artery, it was suspected that the tip of the catheter had got cracked.Thus, the unit was pulled back into a sheath.However, the tip got completely sheared off at that time.As the tip was floating within left superficial femoral artery (sfa), the retrieval of the tip was attempted with a snare.However, the tip went deep into the peripheral region of the sfa.Thus, the vessel was cut down under general anesthesia, and the tip was successfully retrieved with a fogarty catheter.The physician stated that the anatomy had no stenosis or significant tortuosity, and that the cracking and the detachment occurred despite the usual manipulation of the catheter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The suspect device was returned for evaluation.The evlauation could not be completed due to the loss of the device by the investigation team.The absence of the device impeded our ability to perform a necessary physical examination and root cause analysis, which are critical to identifying any defects or issues.Without the device, verifying data such as lot numbers and usage records was impossible, compromising the integrity of the investigation.Continuing the investigation without the device would lead to speculative and potentially misleading conclusions, making it an inefficient use of resources.Therefore, we determined that proceeding without the device would not yield accurate or actionable results.Should the device be found at a later date, then this case may be reopened for a full investigation.The associated failure mode has been identified in the current risk documentation and the current risk estimation is accurate.Nonconformances of this nature are monitored by the engineering, quality and management team members.This complaint will be used to trend for similar complaints.Corrective actions are taken as warranted based on trend analysis per procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IMPRESS®.BRAIDED CATHETER
Common Device Name
CATHETER, INTRAVASCULAR, DIAGNOSTIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS MEXICO
8830 siempre viva rd #100
san diego CA 92154
Manufacturer (Section G)
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS MEXICO
8830 siempre viva rd #100
san diego CA 92154
Manufacturer Contact
bryson heaton
1600 merit parkway
south jordan, UT 84095
8012084662
MDR Report Key18890884
Report Number3011642792-2024-00016
Device Sequence Number18043770
Product Code DQO
UDI-Device Identifier00884450654507
UDI-Public00884450654507
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K053171
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/06/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/22/2026
Device Catalogue Number56538MW2/JPB
Device Lot NumberI2593042
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/06/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/31/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/12/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-