|
As reported, a patient developed a fever following the use of a 'cook cervical ripening balloon'.Upon removal from the package, no damage to the device was noted.The nurse was able to place the device in 3-5 minutes.After the device was indwelling 12-14 hours, it was noted that the patient developed a fever.The device was removed, and artificial rupture of membranes (arom) was performed and oxytocin was administered.The patients hemogram (cbc) test was found to be elevated and it was decided that the patient would be converted from vaginal delivery to cesarean section.The patient's fever was treated with antibiotics.The patient was not cultured to determine the cause of the fever.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E1: customer (person) street = (b)(6).E3: customer occupation = unknown.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation evaluation.As reported, a patient developed a fever following the use of a 'cook cervical ripening balloon'.Upon removal from the package, no damage to the device was noted.The nurse was able to place the device in 3-5 minutes.After the device was indwelling 12-14 hours, it was noted that the patient developed a fever.The device was removed, and artificial rupture of membranes (arom) was performed and oxytocin was administered.The patients hemogram (cbc) test was found to be elevated and it was decided that the patient would be converted from vaginal delivery to cesarean section.The patient's fever was treated with antibiotics.The patient was not cultured to determine the cause of the fever.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control (qc) procedures, as well as inspection of unused product were conducted during the investigation.Visual inspection of the returned complaint device(s) was also conducted.Eight, unopened, 'cook cervical ripening balloon' was returned for investigation.There was no damage to the packages or seals.Review of the device history record, complaint history, and quality control documents does not indicate that the device was manufactured out of specification.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) found no related non-conformances reported for lot.A complaint history database search showed one other related complaints associated with the failure mode for the complaint device for lot.Due to the individual nature of the manufacturing and inspection process for the devices in the lots, it is unlikely that these events are an indication of device issue within the entire lot.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling; the ifu [t_j-ccrb_rev3; 'cook cervical ripening balloon with stylet'] supplied with the device states the following in consideration of the reported failure mode: - warnings: "the product should not be left indwelling for a period greater than 12 hours." - instructions for use: "note: the device is not intended to be in place for longer than 12 hours.Time the placement of the device 12 hours prior to the planned induction." the complaint was confirmed based on customer testimony.Based on the available information, the cause for this event cannot be traced to the complaint device.The most probable cause of this event was related to the user's failure to follow instructions.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|