|
The initial reporter mr.(b)(6)., from (b)(6) stated that they had a life-threatening situation for a patient.When starting the intubation process (noted to be a "difficult intubation"), the device became occupied and stuck without the possibility of removing it from the tube.It was stated that medical intervention was necessary.It was not possible to provide more information regarding the specific medical intervention that occurred.The customer also informed that it is not possible to provide information regarding where the death occurred, what was the status of the patient and they did not provide patient¿s details.Only one sample of this affected batch lot was used in this event.Two products in total were involved.The hospital does not want to provide the information about what kind of tracheal tube was used.According to the head nurse of the ward, (b)(6), the person who performed the intubation was an anesthetist.He did not provide further information about the anesthetist.It is unknown if it was the first time she performed an intubation.(b)(6) commented that it was a difficult intubation during an emergency with an obese patient.They did not use any lubricant due to the speed of the procedure.Medical evaluation: there are two complaints that report a portex intubation stylet was used in a patient and it could not be removed from the endotracheal tube.The report states that the clinical situation led to patient harm and ultimately death.The date of the reported death is (b)(6) 2024.There is no information in the report that states the patient¿s age, gender, medical history or indication for the procedure.The description provided in the report state that the intubation was difficult and the stylet could not be removed from the endotracheal tube.The report also stated that the customer could not provide where the death occurred or other patient details.Lack of details regarding this clinical event or a more detailed description of the clinical event precludes a comprehensive medical assessment.Based on a review of the events in this case, the cumulative evidence does not conclusively implicate or exclude the tracheal intubation stylet as the cause of the patient event, where the stylet could not be removed.If additional information becomes available, this medical assessment update will be further revised as needed.
|