|
BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC THERMOCOOL® SMART TOUCH¿ BI-DIRECTIONAL NAVIGATION CATHETER; SIMILAR DEVICE D132701, PMA # P030031/S053
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
UNK_SMART TOUCH BIDIRECTIONAL |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Stroke/CVA (1770); Cardiac Tamponade (2226)
|
| Date of Event |
11/27/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: wang k, jin c, chen h, yang g, liu h, wang z, jiang x, ju w, chen m.General anesthesia enhances lesion quality and ablation efficiency of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.J arrhythm.2023 nov 27;40(1):76-82.Doi: 10.1002/joa3.12960.Pmid: 38333406; pmcid: pmc10848594.Objective/methods/study data: background: pulmonary vein isolation (pvi) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (af) ablation.General anesthesia (ga) resolves the problem of pain intolerability and provides regular respiratory mode which might improve the catheter maneuverability of af ablation.This study aims to compare the procedural performance of pvi under ga versus conscious sedation (cs) from multiple perspectives.Methods: a total of 36 consecutive patients undergoing first af ablation under ga were enrolled in ga group.Another 109 patients receiving af ablation under cs in the same period were selected as the control group.After propensity score matching, 29 matched pairs with similar baseline characteristics were available for further analysis.The aifv (using ai to analyze the raw data from carto3 system) system was used to evaluate six procedural parameters in each pvi procedure.Results: compared with cs, pvi under ga had a significantly shorter total pvi time (51.4 min vs.67.8 min; p =.003) and higher radiofrequency ratio (62.6% vs.55.8%; p =.032).The number of gaps (1.0 vs.3.0; p <.001) and the rate of break point were significantly lower in the ga group.Ga was also associated with a higher effective ablation-index ratio (87.5% vs.74.1%; p <.001) and effective force-over-time ratio (85.3% vs.69.2%; p =.001).After a medium follow-up time of 24 months, 12/29 (41.4%) patients in the cs group and 6/29 (20.7%) patients in the ga group suffered from af recurrence (p =.156).Conclusions: ga improves the lesion quality and procedural efficiency of pvi from multiple perspectives evaluated by the aifv system.Lot, model and catalog number are not available, but the suspected biosense device possibly associated with reported adverse events: smarttouch ablation catheter concomitant: biosense webster devices that were used in this study: pentaray mapping catheter, carto3 mapping system concomitant: non-biosense webster devices that were also used in this study: sl1 sheath (st.Jude medical) adverse event(s) and provided interventions possibly associated with unidentified smarttouch ablation catheter: qty 1 patient in the cs group suffered from pericardial tamponade, which resolved after pericardial drainage (cardiac tamponade)(recognized procedural complication) qty 2 transient episode of facial palsy and resolved after 20¿min which diagnosed to be a stroke by the magnetic resonance imaging (cerebrovascular accident)(recognized procedural complication).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This complaint is from a literature source.The following literature cite has been reviewed: wang k, jin c, chen h, yang g, liu h, wang z, jiang x, ju w, chen m.General anesthesia enhances lesion quality and ablation efficiency of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation.J arrhythm.2023 nov 27;40(1):76-82.Doi: 10.1002/joa3.12960.Pmid: 38333406; pmcid: pmc10848594.No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because no lot number was provided by the customer.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster, inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster, inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer's ref #: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|