• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC ROADRUNNER NIMBLE HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC ROADRUNNER NIMBLE HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE; OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY Back to Search Results
Model Number G18629
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Device Damaged Prior to Use (2284)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/26/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.E1: phone - (b)(6).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, before an unspecified procedure, the tip of the roadrunner nimble hydrophilic wire guide separated.The device did not make patient contact.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention and did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding event details, patient anatomy and outcome has been requested but is not available at this time.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.Additional information: b5 h3: device evaluated by mfg = other (81) -device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.This report includes information known at this time.¿a follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
The holder was not flushed prior to attempting to remove the wire guide from the holder.The procedure was complete by using another wire guide.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation ¿ evaluation.As reported, before an unspecified procedure, the tip of the roadrunner nimble hydrophilic wire guide separated.The device did not make patient contact.The holder was not flushed prior to attempting to remove the wire guide from the holder.The procedure was complete by using another wire guide.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional intervention and did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control, and instructions for use (ifu), as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.One device was returned in an open package with label to cook for evaluation.A visual examination noted the tip of the wire guide was broken and the coil of the wire guide was exposed.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhr for the reported complaint device lot revealed no recorded non conformances relevant to the failure mode.A complaint history search found no other complaints had been reported for this lot.The evidence from the complaint file, device history record, complaint history and quality control documents indicate that the complaint device was manufactured to specification as well as other items in the lot or similar devices in the field or in house.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device contains the following: instructions for activating hydrophilic coating: the hydrophilic coating on the wire guide is activated by immersion in sterile water or sterile saline solution.1.Prior to using the wire guide, fill a syringe with sterile water or sterile saline solution and attach it to the flushing port on the wire guide.2.Inject enough solution to wet the wire guide surface entirely.This will activate the hydrophilic coating.Based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation.The cause for the complaint could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute toa death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ROADRUNNER NIMBLE HYDROPHILIC WIRE GUIDE
Common Device Name
OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC.
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key18941994
Report Number1820334-2024-00380
Device Sequence Number8204102
Product Code OCY
UDI-Device Identifier00827002186293
UDI-Public(01)00827002186293(17)260629(10)15514413
Combination Product (Y/N)N
PMA/510(K) Number
K082536
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/15/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/29/2026
Device Model NumberG18629
Device Catalogue NumberRFSPC-035145-0-I-AQ
Device Lot Number15514413
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/26/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/27/2024
08/07/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/20/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/23/2024
08/15/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-