| Model Number |
N/A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/13/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.D2a - common device name: additional names: gbo catheter, nephrostomy, general & plastic surgery; lje catheter, nephrostomy.D2b - procode: additional product codes: gbo, lje.E1 - customer (person): postal code: (b)(6).G4 ¿ pma/510(k) #: k173035.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the metal stiffening cannula was difficult to remove from an ultrathane pigtail multipurpose drainage catheter.After puncturing a lesion, it was discovered that the stiffener was stuck in the catheter causing the catheter to compress.The failure was experienced by several radiologists.At this time, no adverse effects or additional procedures for the patient were reported due to this occurrence.Additional information regarding the event and patient outcome has been requested but is currently unavailable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5, h6 (annex e and annex f).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
In additional information provided 25mar2024, it was reported that the puncture of the gallbladder went well.However, they could not advance the catheter as the metal stiffening cannula sticks to the catheter.It was also noted that 2 devices experienced the failure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
When it was discovered that the catheter was unable to be advanced due to the catheter sticking to the catheter, it required another puncture.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Correction: b3, d9, h3 investigation-evaluation it was reported that the metal stiffening cannula was difficult to advance and to remove from an ultrathane pigtail multipurpose drainage catheter.After puncturing a lesion, it was discovered that the stiffener was stuck in the catheter causing the catheter to compress.The failure was experienced by several radiologists.No adverse effects or additional procedures for the patient were reported due to this occurrence.Reviews of documentation including the complaint history, device history record (dhr), quality control, specifications, and instructions for use (ifu) were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examinations could be performed.Cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification.However, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the dhr for the reported complaint device lot and related subassembly lots revealed no recorded non-conformances relevant to the failure mode.A complaint history search identified no other events associated with this lot for this failure mode.Based on the available information, cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Cook also reviewed product labeling.The ifu packaged with the device contains the following in relation to the reported failure mode: ¿under fluoroscopic control, perform standard techniques for placement of percutaneous draining catheters, either by seldinger access or trocar access.-once catheter is in desired location, remove any wire guides, trocars, or stiffeners, allowing the catheter to for its configuration.¿ how supplied: supplied sterilize by ethylene oxide gas in peel-open packages.Intended for one-time use.Sterile if package is unopened or undamaged.Do not use the product if there is doubt as to whether the product is sterile.Store in a dark, dry, cool place.Avoid extended exposure to light.Upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ based on the information provided, no product returned, and the results of the investigation a definitive root cause for this event was traced to a component failure without a manufacturing or design deficiency.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding patient and/or event details has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding patient and/or event details has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation-evaluation the complaint device was not returned.However, on 01 oct 2024, the customer returned seven unopened devices from the same lot.Upon opening these devices and inserting the stiffening cannula into the catheter, no advancement or removal difficulties were encountered.Additionally, each catheter and metal stiffening cannula were examined, confirming that the inner diameter (i.D.) of the catheter and outer diameter (o.D.) of the metal stiffener were within tolerance.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|