|
DEPUY MITEK LLC US IDEAL SUTURE SHUTTLE 45 DEGREES LEFT; INSTRUMENT, LIGATURE PASSING AND KNOT TYING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
251003 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unintended Movement (3026)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/19/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: e3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.Udi: (b)(4).As of this date, the device has not been returned for evaluation; therefore, the reported condition cannot be confirmed and/or duplicated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep in china that during an unspecified surgical procedure on (b)(6) 2024 the ideal suture shuttle 45 degrees left device suture shuttle ring was loose.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There was no delay in the procedure reported.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: a photo was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.The depuy synthes mitek team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo.Visual analysis of the photos revealed that the needle is not correctly oriented.The rest of the device does not show structural anomalies.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed conditions of the ideal suture shuttle 45 degrees left would contribute to the complained devices issue.Based on the investigation findings, the root cause could be attributed to procedural variables, such as handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; excessive force may have been applied to the needle and consequently caused the needle shaft to loosen.And therefore the needle had a free movement.Device history lot: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the device has been evaluated, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to depuy synthes mitek for evaluation.Depuy synthes mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Upon visual inspection of the device, it was observed that it is in used condition, the handle does not show structural anomalies as well as the sleeve.The needle shaft was found to be loose, it has a free movement.The shuttle was not returned.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed conditions of the ideal suture shuttle 45 degrees left would contribute to the complained devices issue.Based on the investigation findings, the root cause is traced to procedural variables, such as handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; excessive force may have been applied to the needle and consequently caused the needle shaft to loosen.And therefore the needle had a free movement.As per the instructions for use: do not apply excessive axial or bending forces to the needle shaft or shuttle during use, as excessive force may limit the function of the device or cause the device to bend, deform or break.It has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|