|
The reported event could not be confirmed, since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidences were provided.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history was not necessary because the implant affected by this complaint has been manufactured prior to 2018.As a result, this implant is expired and can no longer be put on the market or implanted.The complaint history review found no other complaint recorded for this lot number.Moreover, the post market surveillance reviews have not identified any signals for similar issues that would have challenged the efficacy and safety of this product.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Microbiologist reviewed the sterilization procedures, environmental monitoring, bioburden data and the dhr and noted: the subject device was packaged according to established design and process specifications, and was sterilized according to procedure.No deviation for a non-conformance could be found.The nature of the complaint doesn¿t necessitate a drawing review.More detailed information about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.H3 other text : device not available.
|
|
The manufacturer received a report from the national joint registry that contains unpublished collected data on the usage and the outcomes with the tornier shoulder system.The report details analysis provided for procedures performed between (b)(6) 2012 on (b)(6) 2022.During the review of the report, it was identified that on (b)(6) 2018 a patient required revision surgery due to infection, which was not previously reported to the manufacturer.
|