| Catalog Number |
MDE001 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/20/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Match issue.It was reported that before the surgery, noted that the retaining stem inserter did not match with the extraction rod(as the photo shows), and the threads could not completely connected.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No additional information could be provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4) this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: d4 (expiration,lot), h4 if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.B3.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: added: e1 facility name.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4).Investigation summary according to the information received, "match issue.It was reported that before the surgery, noted that the retaining stem inserter did not match with the extraction rod(as the photo shows), and the threads could not completely connected.There were no adverse consequences to the patient." the product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachment (b)(4).The photographs attached were reviewed, however they do not represent the reported complaint condition.Therefore, the investigation could not draw any conclusions about the reported event due to the insufficient evidence provided.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was unconfirmed as the photographs provided are not representative of the reported complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary according to the information received, "match issue.It was reported that before the surgery, noted that the retaining stem inserter did not match with the extraction rod(as the photo shows), and the threads could not completely connected.There were no adverse consequences to the patient." the product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachment (b)(4).The photographs attached were reviewed, however they do not represent the reported complaint condition.Therefore, the investigation could not draw any conclusions about the reported event due to the insufficient evidence provided.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.The overall complaint was unconfirmed as the photographs provided are not representative of the reported complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4) investigation summary according to the information received, "match issue.It was reported that before the surgery, noted that the retaining stem inserter did not match with the extraction rod(as the photo shows), and the threads could not completely connected.There were no adverse consequences to the patient." the product was not returned to depuy synthes, however photos were provided for review.See attachment (b)(4).The photos provided by the customer involved the extraction rod.And the retaining stem inserter.Review of the drawings for the retaining stem inserter (dwg-257005010 rev j) and extraction rod (dwg-r12464 rev e) confirmed these two devices have different thread standards (m10 1.5 on the male threaded end of the extraction rod and 3/8-16 unc-2b on the female threaded end of the cap on the stem inserter).Furthermore, the intended use of the extraction rod is for shoulder stem retrieval whereas the stem inserter is use for hip stem insertion.Forcing them to be used together violates the intended use of these devices as they belong to two incompatible systems.Therefore, the reported event of ¿extraction rod did not match with the retaining stem inserter¿ is confirmed due to the extraction rod and retaining stem inserter are not compatible systems.Since the device was not returned, a dimensional inspection cannot be performed.Extraction rod did not match with the retaining stem inserter is confirmed due to the extraction rod and retaining stem inserter are not compatible systems.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to user, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|