|
It was reported that a femoral vein perforation, bleeding and hypotension occurred.The procedure was cancelled.During a watchman left atrial appendage closure (laac) procedure, a versacross access solution kit was selected for use.The fellow physician used a non-boston scientific guidewire to gain femoral vein access and anchored it in the superior vena cava (svc).Then the versacross sheath was advanced without panning down to the groin which was noted only after the sheath not able to track up to the svc.The guidewire was looped around in the femoral vein and the versacross sheath was bowing down instead of up.The physician removed the sheath and straightened the guidewire.Then a non-boston scientific 16 french introducer was used over the guidewire and re-inserted the sheath over the guidewire through the 16 french introducer.The sheath was placed in the svc, the guidewire was swapped out for the versacross rf wire.The transseptal puncture was performed successfully at an inferior-mid location and the wire was advanced in the left atrium (no issues noted).The versacross sheath was then swapped with a watchman sheath.It was noted that the patient blood pressure dropped from 90 to 60 however it went back to somewhere in the 80s quickly.The echo physician was requested to sweep for effusion, but no effusion was found.The procedure continued.A non-boston scientific pigtail catheter was advanced into the left atrial appendage (laa) and patient's blood pressure was dropped to 60 again, no effusion was found at this time as well.The physician noted patient's groin area was swelling.The physician pulled the introducer sheath and did a contrast shot which revealed a femoral vein perforation.The procedure was cancelled to treat the femoral injury using non-boston scientific balloon catheter and stents to stop the bleeding.The patient was left in stable condition and expected to be fully recovered.The versacross devices are not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).It was further reported that no other issues were noted along with versacross sheath, dilator nor rf wire.There was a possible tortuous femoral vein.Both physicians speculated that the tip of the dilator perforated the femoral vein because the fellow physician did not properly track the sheath and dilator over the j-tip guidewire when advancing into the svc.The perforation site is aligned with the position of the tip when it was coiled around the guidewire.
|