• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. SENSAR IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number AR40M
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
Date of Event 03/05/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section d6a: if implanted; give date: n/a.The intraocular lens was inserted and removed during the same procedure.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) had a haptic that got bent during the loading and when the iol was fully inserted into patient's right eye, the doctor could not get the haptic to straighten.It was observed after insertion.The patient already has an iol, and they were trying to piggyback iol, however, it didn¿t work, so they aborted the procedure.The original iol is still in the eye.Interior vitrectomy and capsular destabilization were performed.Additional information stated that the initial lens was from another company.The lens was implanted, and then removed during the same procedure.The lens was not re-implanted.This was a piggy back procedure so there is still a lens in the patients eye.There was no injury, and no medical or surgical intervention was required.Patient is doing great.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: aug 06,2024.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection was performed on the suspect lens and found the haptic was broken in half/bent.The other haptic was also bent.The optic body also presented with damage.No further evaluation was performed.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order was performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SENSAR IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key19015489
Report Number3012236936-2024-00659
Device Sequence Number3796607
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474501812
UDI-Public(01)05050474501812(17)281020
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOK
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberAR40M
Device Catalogue NumberAR40MN0010-12
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/06/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/27/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/01/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/19/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/20/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight104 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-