• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIOSURE SYNC 7-8MM TIBIAL FIXATION; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. BIOSURE SYNC 7-8MM TIBIAL FIXATION; SCREW, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72202745
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/13/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery, the biosure tibial fixation broke.The procedure was completed with non-significant surgical delay of 30 minutes, and using a back-up device in the originally drilled bone hole and no void left in the patient, and the insertion site was cleared of all debris prior to insertion of the anchor.No further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation.However an image evaluation was performed and found the distal part of what seems to be an inserter, with a broken biosure at the tip, it is next to a broken fixation implant.There is no visual problem with the inserter.In a second image, an analysis of the customer provided image found what seems to be a tensioner device laying on a surface, one of the suture pulley assembly, and a compression spring are detached, and next to the device.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer specifications found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and applicable tests were appropriately specified.A material certificate of analysis was required for the raw material.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10 h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection revealed that it is not in its original packaging.The hub and 3 of the 4 fins are still connected but the fins are bent and not in their original positions, the 4th fin is fractured away from the hub.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection ,additional material testing is not required.An analysis of the customer provided image found the distal part of what seems to be an inserter, with a broken biosure at the tip, it is next to a broken fixation implant.There is no visual problem with the inserter.In a second image, an analysis of the customer provided image found what seems to be a tensioner device laying on a surface, one of the suture pulley assembly, and a compression spring are detached, and next to the device.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the polymer specifications found that the storage requirements, material specifications, and applicable tests were appropriately specified.A material certificate of analysis was required for the raw material.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BIOSURE SYNC 7-8MM TIBIAL FIXATION
Common Device Name
SCREW, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key19021352
Report Number1219602-2024-00673
Device Sequence Number11732582
Product Code HWC
UDI-Device Identifier03596010648983
UDI-Public03596010648983
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K093943
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/08/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72202745
Device Lot Number51042427
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/13/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/16/2024
08/07/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/02/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/17/2024
08/08/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/23/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age17 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-