• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2700
Medical Device Problem Codes Gradient Increase (1270); Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 10/20/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device is not available for evaluation, as the device status is unknown at this time.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve, was explanted after an implant duration of five (5) years, five (5) months due to unknown reason.The explanted valve was replaced with a 29mm 11500a valve.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated sections: b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h6 (component code, clinical code, device code, type of investigation).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve, was explanted after an implant duration of five (5) years, five (5) months due to stenosis and prosthesis-patient mismatch.The patient presented with heart failure.The explanted valve was replaced with a 29mm 11500a valve.Post-procedure, the patient was discharged in stable condition.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: d4 (expiration date), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions).The device history record (dhr) review was completed and there were two non-conformances found related to this serial number.However, the valve was re-worked to completion, passing all inspections.Patient prosthesis mismatch (ppm) is present when the effective orifice area of the implanted bioprosthetic valve is too small in relation to body size.Literature indicates ppm's main hemodynamic consequence is to generate higher than expected gradients through a normally functioning bioprosthetic valve.It has been shown to be associated with worse hemodynamic function, less regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, more cardiac events, and lower survival.Improperly sized valves with ppm can hasten the development of early degenerative changes and premature prosthetic valve dysfunction with varying degrees of prosthetic valve stenosis and regurgitation.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.A definitive root cause cannot be conclusively determined; however, patient factors likely caused or contributed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT, HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key19021512
Report Number2015691-2024-02493
Device Sequence Number3796783
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103021608
UDI-Public(01)00690103021608(17)200830
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/30/2020
Device Model Number2700
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/08/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/02/2024
05/03/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/02/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/24/2024
05/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-