|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP IMPLANTABLE PORT, CHRONOFLEX SINGLE-LUMEN, 6F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1706061 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930); Sepsis (2067); Septic Shock (2068); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
10/15/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not requested as the lot number reported as unknown.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical record were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that sometime post a port placement, the patient allegedly developed infection.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that two months and nine days post a port placement, the patient allegedly developed with clostridium difficile infection related to the port.It was further reported that was allegedly diagnosed with severe sepsis and experienced septic shock.Furthermore, the infected port was removed.Reportedly, the patient was expired and the cause of death was not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: additional information was received, and the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as death.H10: date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as 01-jan-1900 for the mdr submission requirement h10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiry date: 12/2022).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as (b)(6)1900 for the mdr submission requirement.H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.However, a medical record was provided for review.Based on this medical record, the infection, sepsis, and septic shock are confirmed.However, the medical records did not contain information on the patient death, and no death certificate was provided.The cause of death is currently unknown.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported patient death.The relationship between the device and confirmed infection, sepsis septic shock and reported patient death is unknown.The medical records do not contain definitive reasoning that the device was the cause of the failure.Therefore, based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for the event is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: b5, g3, h6 (method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that two months and nine days post a port placement, the patient allegedly developed with clostridium difficile infection related to the port.It was further reported that the patient was allegedly diagnosed with severe sepsis and experienced septic shock.Reportedly, the infected port was removed.Evidently, the patient was expired and the cause of death was not provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|