| Model Number |
SA60AT |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Opacification (1426)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
03/07/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A healthcare professional reported with the description of intraocular lens (iol) got opaque which was implanted in the year 2007.Additional information has been received and stated that the iol was explanted in a secondary procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.The lens was returned from ftw, dry in a centrifuge tube.No opacification was observed.The lens had multiple areas of yag pitting across the central portion of the optic.Power and resolution were verified.The lens met specifications for a company model, 23.0 diopter lens.Testing conducted at ftw indicated the lens was not opacified.The observed phenomenon was most likely hydration dependent light scattering which is not visible in a dry date.Product history records were reviewed, and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.The root cause for the reported issue could not be verified.The returned lens was not opacified.It was stated that the lens implanted in 2007 when the patient was 13 years old looked opacified.It is unclear if the patient was having visual issues.The returned lens power and resolution were verified, and the lens met specification.The lens was clear in a dry state.Testing conducted at ftw indicated the lens was not opacified.The observed phenomenon was most likely hydration dependent light scattering which is not visible in a dry date.Information was provided that due to fibrosis and weak zonules the patient was implanted noncompany 20.5 diopter poly methyl methacrylate iol which is a difference of 2.5 diopters.Information on the lens findings were provide to the surgeon.No further requests were made.File will be reopened if new information is received.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On initial mdr the imdrf health event code of f24 was an error.It should have been f1903 on the original mdr.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|