• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA25 AND DISTAL CATHETER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA25 AND DISTAL CATHETER; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX421T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 03/12/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (#fx421t) was implanted during a procedure performed on: unknown.According to the complainant, the shunt system showed an under-drainage and adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.The complainant device has returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 40 years weight: 90 kgs height: 175 cm gender: male.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, deposits on the devices were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the valves operate within the permissible tolerance in their respective relevant positions.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test:: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.To make the deposits in the shunt system more visible, they were colored using a staining solution.Results: based on our investigation results, we can detect visible deposits on both valves.The deposits did not affect the technical properties at the time of the inspection.At the time of the examination, it is not clear to us how the aforementioned functional impairment occurred.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can have a temporary effect on function and are known side effects of hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 WITH SA25 AND DISTAL CATHETER
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key19044433
Report Number3004721439-2024-00076
Device Sequence Number20659985
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906136635
UDI-Public4041906136635
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySZ
PMA/510(K) Number
K161853
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 04/04/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Expiration Date06/30/2021
Device Model NumberFX421T
Device Catalogue NumberFX421T
Device Lot Number20031671
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/21/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/15/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/04/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/18/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age40 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight90 KG
-
-