| Model Number |
M0061921320 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Discomfort (2330); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
03/10/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: imdrf device code a0401 captures the reportable event of stent buckled material, inside the patient.Imdrf impact code f05 captures the reportable event of delay to treatment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a flexible ureterolithomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.During the procedure, the stent did not pass through the guidewire.It was noted that the stent was buckled.The stent was soaked in water for approximately 5 to 10 minutes, however, due to the failure to pass, it had to be removed.The procedure had to be canceled because the patient became complicated, and discomfort was experienced.It was noted that the discomfort experienced was from the specialists with the product problem.There were no additional patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Imdrf device code a0401 captures the reportable event of stent buckled material, inside the patient.Imdrf impact code f05 captures the reportable event of delay to treatment.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a flexible ureterolithomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.During the procedure, the stent did not pass through the guidewire.It was noted that the stent was buckled.The stent was soaked in water for approximately 5 to 10 minutes, however, due to the failure to pass, it had to be removed.The procedure had to be canceled because the patient became complicated, and discomfort was experienced.It was noted that the discomfort experienced was from the specialists with the product problem.There were no additional patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block h6: imdrf device code a0401 captures the reportable event of stent buckled material, inside the patient.Imdrf impact code f05 captures the reportable event of delay to treatment.Block h11: the returned polaris ultra ureteral stent was analyzed, and upon magnification it was observed that the bladder coil was buckled.Additionally, the suture and positioner were not returned.During functional inspection, the mandrel 0.039 was loaded into the device and no resistance was felt.The reported event was confirmed.With all the available information, boston scientific concludes that the reported event was confirmed.It is possible to conclude that this problem could be caused by operational factors, interaction of the device between the positioner and the guide wire while the device was pushing up, such as excess of force applied over the device during the procedure could have contributed to the failure, consistently leading to device being buckled and did not allow advancement.Consequently, affect the performance of the device during the procedure.The impact code pain or discomfort may be associated with the use of the device.This event is assigned the most probable cause as known inherent risk of device.Therefore, all compiled information on this investigation determines that the most probable cause is adverse event related to procedure since the adverse event occurred during the procedure and the device had no influence on event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a polaris ultra ureteral stent was used during a flexible ureterolithomy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2024.During the procedure, the stent did not pass through the guidewire.It was noted that the stent was buckled.The stent was soaked in water for approximately 5 to 10 minutes, however, due to the failure to pass, it had to be removed.The procedure had to be canceled because the patient became complicated, and discomfort was experienced.It was noted that the discomfort experienced was from the specialists with the product problem.There were no additional patient complications reported.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|