• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIU375
Medical Device Problem Codes Use of Device Problem (1670); Scratched Material (3020); Ejection Problem (4009)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/28/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the johnson and johnson(jnj) preloaded intraocular lens (iol) didn¿t implant all the way through the incision.The surgeon removed the lens from sub-incisional and the technician reloaded it into a new cartridge and inserter.Customer is unsure if the scratch was on the lens prior to surgery or if it happened when manipulating the lens out of the eye and into a new cartridge.Customer opened a new iol jnj model diu300 and the lens was inserted as planned.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a4, a5 patient information: information unknown/not provided.Section d6a, if implanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was removed and replaced during the same procedure.Therefore, not explanted.Section h3-other (81): the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9: date returned to manufacturer: apr 22, 2024.Section h3: evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the device was inspected under magnification.The complaint device presented with the cartridge tip split and the plunger rod bent in a way that could have occurred during shipping.The cartridge presented with viscoelastic residue dispersed through the length of the cartridge.The lens module was inspected and no damage or viscoelastic residue was identified.The device assembly was inspected and no issues were identified.The plunger rod was inspected and advanced with no issues.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, INTRAOCULAR, TORIC OPTICS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key19047873
Report Number3012236936-2024-01004
Device Sequence Number8472312
Product Code MJP
UDI-Device Identifier05050474748019
UDI-Public(01)05050474748019(17)240403
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/20/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/03/2024
Device Model NumberDIU375
Device Catalogue NumberDIU375U050
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/28/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/14/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/04/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/20/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/03/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-