MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZIMMER DENTAL IMP,TM 3.7MM MTX,10MM; DENTAL IMPLANT

Catalog Number	TMMB10
Medical Device Problem Codes	Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); Unspecified Infection (1930); Osteolysis (2377)
Date of Event	03/11/2024
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie complaint number cmp (b)(4).Event problem codes - patient code 1932: inflammation; 1994: pain.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported a periimplantitis at tooth site #24.Patient with allergy to titanium, without medical pathologies of interest.After 3 weeks the implant presented mobility with infection.Patient also suffered an abscess, pain and inflammation.Implant was removed.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).The following fields have been updated: b4: date of this report.B5: describe event or problem.D4: additional device information.D9: device availability.G3: date received by manufacturer.G6: type of report.H1: type of reportable event.H2: follow up type.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer.H4: device manufacturer date.H6: adverse event problem.H10: additional narrative.Zimvie received one (1) tmmb10, implant, trabecular metal 3.7mmd x 10mml, mtx for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed.The implant had signs of use with markings from removal.The implant had debris on its internal and external threads.No damage identified or signs of malfunction that would have contributed to the event.Measurements match drawing.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 1270382.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 1270382 for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: dental : medical : allergic reaction + peri-implantitis.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was external factors, i.E., patient's condition.Refer to attached summary investigation for peri-implantitis.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did not occur.The implant had signs of use.No damage identified or signs of malfunction that would contribute to the event.The reported event was non-verifiable with all the available information provided.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the product was nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.Peri-implantitis is an infectious disease that causes inflammation of the gum and the bone structure around a dental implant.Chronic inflammation causes bone loss, which can lead to implant failure thus its removal.Investigations performed for hundreds of events where either of these conditions, infection, or bone loss, or both, have been reported, have concluded that the likely cause(s) for the implant failure in relation to these conditions are external factors.Those include medical conditions (e.G., diabetes, bruxism, etc.), patient habits (e.G., smoking, bad oral hygiene routine) and user error (e.G., surgical technique).There has not been any instance where either infection and/or bone loss, and when right conditions prevail and led to peri-implantitis whether reported or not along with the other two, have resulted from a manufacturing or design defect.Furthermore, the probability of manufacturing or design defects that might lead to infection and result in bone loss occurring and escaping the available detections has been assessed and found remote and almost nonexistent.Zimvie quality management system (qms) has controls in place to ensure the distribution of conforming product.The analysis and result of investigations and the analysis of probability previously described are contained in the summary investigation reports performed for bone loss and infection, which are attached.Additionally, all device history record reviews verified that each implant was sterilized per procedure for every device.All complaint data used for the summary investigation was found to be conforming and did not meet capa/hhe/d/ or any further escalations.Therefore, there were no complaints which confirmed a manufacturing or design related issue that did or could cause or contribute to the reported event.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.
Event or Problem Description
No further event information is available at the time of this report.

• Brand Name: IMP,TM 3.7MM MTX,10MM
• Common Device Name: DENTAL IMPLANT
• Manufacturer (Section D): ZIMMER DENTAL; 4555 riverside drive; palm beach gardens FL 33410
• Manufacturer (Section G): ZIMMER DENTAL; 4555 riverside drive; palm beach gardens FL 33410
• Manufacturer Contact: carlos gordian-arroyo ; 4555 riverside drive; palm beach gardens, FL 33410 ; 5619713230
• MDR Report Key: 19062318
• Report Number: 0002023141-2024-01093
• Device Sequence Number: 6752653
• Product Code: DZE
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00889024018860
• UDI-Public: (01)00889024018860(17)280817(10)1270382
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter Country: SP
• PMA/510(K) Number: K132258
• Exemption Number: 5645646
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2024
• Device Explanted Year: 2024
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Foreign,Health Professional
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Dentist
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 09/02/2024

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Lay User/Patient
• Device Catalogue Number: TMMB10
• Device Lot Number: 1270382
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: Device Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Returned to Manufacturer: 03/14/2024
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: Not provided
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: Not provided
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 04/08/2024
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 09/03/2024
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 08/18/2023
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Unknown
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Sex: Female
• Patient Ethnicity: Non Hispanic