• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number FEM06080
Medical Device Problem Codes Positioning Failure (1158); Material Perforation (2205); Misfire (2532)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/14/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 11/2025) h11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device pending return.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure in the left brachial via the left arm access, the device allegedly failed to deploy.It was further reported that the distal end of the stent was allegedly slightly out of the catheter.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: based on the information available it is not reasonably suggested that a manufacturing process may have caused or contributed to the reported issue.However, the lot history records of this lot were reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met the specification prior to shipment.Investigation summary: the sample was returned for evaluation.The stent was still loaded in the delivery catheter and the outer sheath was elongated.One of the stent marker was found squeezed between the pusher and sheath which caused it to perforate the sheath.Deployment attempts led to further elongation of the outer sheath without stent graft release which leads to confirmed results for deployment failure and material perforation.A photo was provided in which the operator was holding the device in a polymer bag; the distal part of the delivery catheter is visible with the stent graft still loaded inside the catheter without any visible partial deployment.It was reported that a 9f introducer was used for access, the tracking vessel was neither tortuous nor calcified, the lesion was predilated and the device was flushed prior to use.Based on the provided information and evaluation of the returned sample, the investigation is closed with confirmed results for deployment failure and material perforation.A definite root cause for the reported event could not be determined.Labeling review: in reviewing the relevant labeling, it was found that the instructions for use sufficiently address the potential risks.The instructions for use state: 'if unusual resistance or high deployment force is encountered during stent graft deployment, abort the procedure, remove the delivery system and use an alternative device'.Regarding preparation of the device the instructions for use state that "prior to loading the vascular system over a guide wire, both ports must be flushed with sterile saline.Flushing these lumens will also facilitate stent graft deployment".Regarding accessories the instructions for use states: "prepare a stiff 0.035" guidewire per its instructions for use and advance the guidewire under fluoroscopy to the target location.The use of an appropriately sized introducer sheath is recommended".The packaging pictograms indicate an introducer size of 8f and a 0.035" guidewire.H10: d4 (expiration date: 11/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a stent graft placement procedure in the left brachial via the left arm access, the device allegedly failed to deploy.It was further reported that the distal end of the stent was allegedly slightly out of the catheter.The procedure was completed by using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FLUENCY PLUS ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Common Device Name
ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
ANGIOMED GMBH & CO. MEDIZINTECHNIK KG
wachhausstr. 6
karlsruhe 76227
GM   76227
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key19069524
Report Number2020394-2024-00473
Device Sequence Number4631395
Product Code PFV
UDI-Device Identifier04049519008400
UDI-Public(01)04049519008400
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130029
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/25/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberFEM06080
Device Lot NumberANGY2188
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/15/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/18/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/09/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/26/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-