|
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving a ceramic head was reported.The event was confirmed via evaluation of the returned device.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned device was performed as part of the material analysis: "image shows the returned pieces of the alumina ceramic head and the trident alumina insert / sleeve assembly.On visual examination, fracture of the head was observed with three large pieces, eighteen small pieces and several fragments returned.The pieces showed a generally longitudinal fracture pattern.This type of pattern is created by hoop stress through the wedge effect of the stem trunnion.[.] stereo microscope imaging was performed on the three large pieces of the head, as shown.Due to an intentional bias in the taper dimensions, the contact pattern characteristic of normal head/neck assembly is a continuous ring of stem metal transfer located near the proximal end of the tapered surface [1].The three large pieces were examined for evidence of this metal transfer ring, with arrows highlighting the ring.Figures show the presence of crack arrest lines which are indications of overload fracture." material analysis: a material analysis was performed on the returned device which concluded the following: "review of alumina ceramic head, catalogue # 17-2800e, lot code 47115702 confirmed fracture.Characterisation using stereo microscopy confirmed the head fractured in overload.No manufacturing or material related defects were observed on the device surfaces examined." -clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: "undated/unlabeled: x-ray ap hip.Secure fit style stem with some midportion bony ingrowth, but there is a pedestal.There are hypertrophic changes in the proximal femur.There is a trident style acetabular shell, uncemented, with a single screw that looks stable.There bearing looks consistent with an alumina metal-backed shell.The femoral head is fractured and subsided onto the stem.Conclusion/assessment: no medical records from the index procedure, or radiographs were provided for review.No pre or postop management of the revision procedure were provided for review.From the data provided a patient sustained a fracture of a ceramic femoral head.It appears to be in an alumina on alumina bearing with a metal-backed alumina acetabular liner.Event confirmation: fracture of a ceramic head can be confirmed.A revision procedure can be confirmed only by the explanted implants.Root cause: the root cause of the revision would be a fractured ceramic head.The root cause of the ceramic head cannot be determined." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to fracture of the ceramic head.Material analysis of the returned device indicated the following: "on visual examination, fracture of the head was observed with three large pieces, eighteen small pieces and several fragments returned.The pieces showed a generally longitudinal fracture pattern.This type of pattern is created by hoop stress through the wedge effect of the stem trunnion.[.] stereo microscope imaging was performed on the three large pieces of the head.Due to an intentional bias in the taper dimensions, the contact pattern characteristic of normal head/neck assembly is a continuous ring of stem metal transfer located near the proximal end of the tapered surface [1].The three large pieces were examined for evidence of this metal transfer ring, with arrows highlighting the ring.Figures show the presence of crack arrest lines which are indications of overload fracture.[.] characterisation using stereo microscopy confirmed the head fractured in overload.No manufacturing or material related defects were observed on the device surfaces examined." a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant further confirmed the event, but a root cause could not be determined from the information provided.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information becomes available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|