| Model Number |
9010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Restenosis (4576); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
03/12/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: d4 (expiration date: 08/2025).H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial that approximately three months fifteen days post index procedure using a drug coated balloon catheter, the subject had an adverse event of severe stenosis of anastomosis and juxta anastomotic cephalic vein and was treated with an standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.Reportedly the adverse event were not related to the device, procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.The re-intervention was successful, no new access created and the outcome was resolved.The current status of the patient was not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 08/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that approximately three months and fifteen days post an index procedure completion using a drug coated balloon catheter, the subject had an adverse event of severe stenosis of anastomosis and juxta anastomotic cephalic vein and was treated with an standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.Reportedly the adverse event were not related to the device, procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.The re-intervention was successful, no new access created and the outcome was resolved.The current status of the patient was not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: additional information was received, and the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as death.H10: date of death for this patient was not provided, date of death updated as 01-jan-1900 for the mdr submission requirement.H10: h10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H10: g3, h6 (patient).H11: b5, d4 (unique identifier (udi) #).H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial that approximately three months fifteen days post an index procedure using a drug coated balloon catheter, the subject had an adverse event of severe stenosis of anastomosis and juxta anastomotic cephalic vein and was treated with an standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.Reportedly the adverse event were not related to the device, procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.The re-intervention involved on the target lesion with initial stenosis of 58% and final residual stenosis of 0% by standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and lutonix drug coated balloon.The re-intervention was successful, no new access created and the outcome was resolved.Reportedly, the subject was expired and the cause of death was not provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: additional information was received, and the file was reassessed for reportability and determined to be reportable as serious injury.H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial that three months and fifteen days post an index procedure using a drug coated balloon catheter, the subject had an adverse event of severe stenosis of anastomosis and juxta anastomotic cephalic vein and was treated with an standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.Reportedly, the adverse event were not related to the device, procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.The re-intervention involved on the target lesion with initial stenosis of 58% and final residual stenosis of 0% by standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and lutonix drug coated balloon.The re-intervention was successful, no new access created and the outcome was resolved.Reportedly, the subject was expired due to acute pulmonary edema and the death was not related to device, procedure and av access circuit.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial that three months and fifteen days post an index procedure using a drug coated balloon catheter, the subject had an adverse event of severe stenosis of anastomosis and juxta anastomotic cephalic vein and was treated with an standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.Reportedly, the adverse event were not related to the device, procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.The re-intervention involved on the target lesion with initial stenosis of 58% and final residual stenosis of 0% by standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and lutonix drug coated balloon.The re-intervention was successful, no new access created and the outcome was resolved.Reportedly, the subject was expired due to acute pulmonary edema and the death was not related to device, procedure and av access circuit.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|