• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGRADXT
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Fire (2610); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Laceration(s) (1946)
Date of Event 03/13/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant products: egiaustnd, egiaustnd endogia ultra univ std stap, (lot #p3l0858) egia60amt, egia60amt egia 60 artic med thick sulu, (lot #unknown).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
According to the reporter, during a laparoscopic low anterior resection, when the surgeon was about to remove the rectum with a purple 60mm reload, the loading unit could not be closed due to tissue being thick.Then, the black loading unit was connected, and the green button was pressed, but the handle could not be triggered, and the device did not fire.There was also a small plastic part from the loading unit that broke off.The surgery was converted into an open procedure, extended the incision, and exposed the rectum with a stapler from a different manufacturer.Surgical time was extended for more than 30 minutes.The purple reload was able to be used with no issue with a different handle.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device and a photo were available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the reload was pre-fired and engaged in interlock.The jaws of the reload were open.Staples were protruding from the proximal end of the staple cartridge channel.There was a visible gap between i-beam and the sled while the interlock was engaged.A piece of the adapter was disengaged and received taped to the reload shaft.It was reported that the component disengaged and the instrument did not fire.The reported issues were confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.This issue can occur if the instrument firing handle had been partially compressed and released after pressing the green firing button.In this situation, the safety interlock feature will engage and prevent the reload from firing a second time by ceasing the placement of staples and tissue transection and prevent patient harm.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut and/or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis and/or leakage.It clearly states instructions for proper use of stapler.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Common Device Name
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key19088244
Report Number1219930-2024-01519
Device Sequence Number7071531
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521543751
UDI-Public10884521543751
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K160176
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/13/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGRADXT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGRADXT
Device Lot NumberN2L0509Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/26/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/14/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/10/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/11/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/13/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/22/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-