|
ACCLARENT, INC. TRUDI SHAVER BLADE 4.0MM - 15° CURVED - 5PK; DRILL, SURGICAL, ENT (ELECTRIC OR PNEUMATIC) INCLUDING HANDPIECE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
TSB415 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Incorrect Interpretation of Signal (1543)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/09/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The healthcare professional reported that during a primary hybrid bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery (fess) procedure, accuracy was off by over 4mm on the trudi system.The 0° trudi nav suction device (tdns000z), 70° trudi nav suction device (tdns070z), and 4.0mm ¿ 15° trudi navigation shaver blade (tsb415) were affected by the accuracy issues.The patient was re-registered two more times, but the issue persisted.The procedure continued without resolution.There was no report of any negative patient impact.On 11-apr-2024, additional information was received.Per the information, accuracy was confirmed using the registration probe after the registration process was completed.The end user did confirm accuracy known landmarks in endoscopic visualization inside the nasal cavity.Inaccuracy was determined by placing the suction device inside the nose and testing.Inaccuracy was first noticed when placing suction on the middle [turbinate] and it showed they were on [inferior turbinate].Accuracy was validated using both registration probe and instrumentation.Computed tomography (ct) image was used as the primary image.Field of view was axial.There were no noticeable defects to the ct scanned images.Related to the registration process, the information indicated that it was the physician who performed the registration.Accuracy was confirmed on the [turbinate], uncinate, skull base, and maxillary wall.The software version of the trudi system is version 2.3.2.3.During the procedure, there was no potential for metal interference.The patient tracker did not move during the procedure.The patient tracker cable was not under tension in relation to this event.There was no ferromagnetic material placed within the trudi zone.The emitter pad did not move and the patient did not move.No other device shaft was in the proximity to the transmitter of the emitter pad.Related to the 4.0mm ¿ 15° trudi navigation shaver blade (tsb415), when the accuracy issue was observed, the bar below the device icon on the trudi system monitor was green.There was no error message on the trudi nav.Monitor.The 4.0mm ¿ 15° trudi navigation shaver blade was plugged in after registration.Inaccuracy was determined when placing [the device] on anatomy inside nose.The crosshairs did not turn yellow.The serial number marked on the white trudi connector (usb) cannot be obtained.The white dongle was used with the device.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section d.2b: procode is pgw/erl.Section d.4: the expiration date of the device is not known as the device lot number is not available / not reported.Section e.1: the name, phone and email address of the initial reporter are not available / reported.Section h.4: the device manufacture date is not known as the device lot number is not available / not reported.Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.The device lot number was not available.The manufacturing documentation review could not be performed without the lot number.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the information available and without the complaint product available to be returned for analysis, the reported product issue documented in the complaint cannot be confirmed through functional evaluation and analysis.The lot number of the device is not known; therefore, manufacturing documentation review was not performed.Assignment of root cause for the event remains speculative and inconclusive, based on the limited information provided and without the return of the complaint sample; however, it is possible that clinical and procedural factors, including device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered at a later time.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This is one of 3 products involved with the reported complaint.The associated manufacturer report numbers are: 3005172759-2024-00025 and 3005172759-2024-00026.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by acclarent, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, acclarent, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|