| Catalog Number |
204-22-11 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360); Osteolysis (2377); Joint Laxity (4526); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
|
| Date of Event |
04/02/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section h10: (h3) pending evaluation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, the 76 year old female patient had an initial tka in 2010.The patient has been experiencing swelling, pain, and what felt like a poking sensation in her knees.X-ray studies showed a slight inclination in the tibial implant.We have regularly monitored the x-ray reports which showed worsening.The patient was revised for suspected osteolysis.Additional details pending.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3: the revision reported may have been the result of osteolysis and aseptic loosening as stated in the documentation.The aseptic (non-infected) tibial loosening may have been the result of a combination of patient-related conditions and insufficient bonds between the tibial tray and the bone.However, the osteolysis and tibial loosening cannot be confirmed as the explanted devices were not returned for evaluation.H7: z-0019-2022.Additional information: h6 clinical code.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: d4, h4.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and/or corrected information.The following sections were updated: b5, g4.The following sections were corrected: b3, h6, h11.No device was returned for evaluation; radiograph images were provided; however, the reported event was unable to be confirmed.The review identified that there appears to be an area of bone loss along the medial aspect of the tibial bone.However, this cannot be confirmed from the information provided.Tibial loosening and prosthesis wear of the tibial insert cannot be evaluated as product images, initial post-operative radiographs, and pre-revision radiographs were not provided.Operative notes and/or medical records were not provided for review of usage/ technique.A review of manufacturing data was performed and identified that a bag used in the packaging of our polyethylene inserts had been produced outside of our quality specifications.The use of these non-conforming bags may enable increased oxygen diffusion to the uhmwpe (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene) insert, resulting in increased oxidation of the material relative to inserts packaged with bags that conform to exactech¿s specifications.For inserts with greater than five years of shelf life, increased oxidation of the inserts can lead to premature polyethylene wear resulting in a revision surgery.However, it cannot be confirmed whether these tibial inserts were packaged in a non-conforming bag since manufacturing information was not available for this device.A review of complaint history determined that no further action is required as no trends were identified.A definitive root cause was unable to be determined; however, may have resulted from tibial loosening and prosthesis wear of the polyethylene component.It remains unclear if the reported loosening contributed to the reported instability.However, prosthesis wear, tibial loosening, and instability cannot be confirmed and potential contributions of user or patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not returned for evaluation and product images, initial post-operative radiographs, and pre-revision radiographs were not provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received indicates the patient was complaining of pain and instability in their left knee.No history of fall, no history of fever.Upon examination a varus deformity, limpness and laxity were seen in the left knee.Painful range of movement noted.No signs of local inflammation.X-ray showed severe osteolysis, bone loss with implant loosening on the tibial side with peri-prosthetic osteolysis on the femoral side.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|