|
|
| Catalog Number |
71675383 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Implant Pain (4561); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
02/15/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after intramedullary nailing fixation surgery had been performed on (b)(6) 2021, the patient experienced a lag/comp screw kit 95/90 rupture that was discovered in (b)(6) 2023.In (b)(6) 2023, a medical accident appraisal was conducted.The product is still inside the patient's body and has not been removed.The patient is currently bedridden at home.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after intramedullary nailing fixation surgery had been performed on (b)() 2021, the patient experienced a intertan 10s 10mm x 18cm 125d rupture that was discovered in (b)(6) 2023.In (b)(6) 2023, a medical accident appraisal was conducted.The product is still inside the patient's body and has not been removed.The patient is currently bedridden at home.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d10 corrected data: b5, d1, d4 (catalog number, lot number, expiration date, unique identifier (udi) #), h4, h6 (health effect - clinical code, health effect - impact code).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H3, h6: although the involvement of all the devices was reported, the relationship with the investigated failure was directly associated to the intertan nail.Given the nature of the alleged incident, the device could not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the limited information provided the clinical root cause for the reported intertan nail fracture could not be confirmed but changes in bone over time in a patient that is bedridden could lead to micromotion and stress fatigue in a nail over time.Also further falls in a bedridden patient is also a consideration though this was not reported and cannot be confirmed.The x-ray from 2023 shows radiolucency and confirms the breakage of the femoral nail.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for intramedullary nail system revealed that cracking or fracture of the implant components has been identified in possible adverse effects section.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with inspection drawing, the final inspection includes the verification of part configuration per print.Also, per material specification, the quality and manufacture of standard grade titanium alloy shall be controlled.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include micromotion, stress fatigue, patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb, excessive forces and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|