• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV414T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 03/22/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav shuntsystem 25 (#fv414t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.According to the complainant, the shunt system was blocked and had adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Patient information: age: 2 years 7 months, weight: 13 kg, height: 90 cm, gender: female.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the investigation, a deformation of the outer housing of the progav could be determined.The measurement of the plane parallelism could confirm that with a value of -0,07 mm - outside tolerance (0 ± 0.02 mm).Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the progav does not operate within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal position.An accelerated outflow of progav could be determined.The test bench measurement for the shuntassistant could not be carried out completely because the valve had become blocked in the meantime.Adjustment test: the progav was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function operates as expected; however, the breaking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine an accelerated outflow and adjustment difficulties for the progav.Initially, the entire system was permeable, but in the course of the investigation the shuntassistant got clogged.The determined deposits can be named as the cause for the accelerated outflow and the blockage.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 25
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key19127974
Report Number3004721439-2024-00097
Device Sequence Number12851724
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906132118
UDI-Public4041906132118
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K103003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2024
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 04/17/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberFV414T
Device Catalogue NumberFV414T
Device Lot Number20070911
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/09/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/09/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/17/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/16/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age24 MO
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight13 KG
-
-