• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THE ANSPACH EFFORT LLC 6.5CM PEDIATRIC CRANIOTOME; MOTOR, DRILL, ELECTRIC - CRANIOTOME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THE ANSPACH EFFORT LLC 6.5CM PEDIATRIC CRANIOTOME; MOTOR, DRILL, ELECTRIC - CRANIOTOME Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CRANI-P
Medical Device Problem Codes Vibration (1674); Device Damaged by Another Device (2915); Excessive Heating (4030)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/01/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: this device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.The device is being further investigated.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted.D4: udi: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported from japan that during service and repair/pre-testing, it was observed that the craniotome device overheated, it was difficult to attach it to the motor device, was vibrating, the bearing was worn and the device was bent.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The date of event was unknown but was known to have occurred in 2024.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: this device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.An evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device heated up, the bearing was worn, the neuro tip was damaged, vibrated and was difficult to assemble and disassemble.Therefore, the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was traced to component failure due to normal wear.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: it was further observed that the device dural guard was broken, the motor connection and bar were snagging, made an abnormal noise, was vibrating and generated heat.The device also failed pretests for visual assessment, lock operation, cutter insertion, vibration and temperature assessment.H4: the date of manufacture has been added.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
6.5CM PEDIATRIC CRANIOTOME
Common Device Name
MOTOR, DRILL, ELECTRIC - CRANIOTOME
Manufacturer (Section D)
THE ANSPACH EFFORT LLC
4500 riverside drive
palm beach gardens FL 33410
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
4500 riverside drive
palm beach gardens, FL 33410
3035526892
MDR Report Key19143281
Report Number1045834-2024-00401
Device Sequence Number7834053
Product Code HBC
UDI-Device Identifier00845384001775
UDI-Public00845384001775
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K011444
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/19/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberCRANI-P
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/29/2024
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/03/2024
06/05/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/19/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/04/2024
06/07/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/10/2012
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-