|
(b)(4).Date sent: 4/19/2024.D4: batch #101c24.B3: only event year known: 2024.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the cr40g reload was received with all staples protruding, the washer uncut, and the knife recessed below the reload deck.The drivers were noted to be partially advanced.No functional test was performed due to the condition of the reload.In addition, a tyvek was received along with the device.The condition of the reload is consistent with the device being partially activated.As a result of the partial firing the lockout was engaged when the device was reopened.Do not fire the instrument unless the closure trigger is properly latched against the handle.The firing trigger must be pulled back completely against the closure trigger to properly fire the instrument.In addition, if the firing sequence is not complete, you could deploy the staples without cutting the washer and forming the staples.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 101c24, and no non-conformances were identified.The lot# 598a20 history records were reviewed and certified by external manufacturing that the manufacturing criteria were met prior to the release of the equipment.The certificate records are accessible through external manufacturing.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent: please provide more details of the device malfunction? did the device cut? if the device cut/fired, was the cut line complete? did the device staple? if the device stapled/fired, was the staple line complete? if the device stapled, was the shape of the staples (b-formation, irregular, unformed)? did the device close? did the device fire? did the device open? was the device difficult to close on the tissue? was the device difficult to fire? was the device difficult to open? on which firing did this occur? did the tissue retaining pin lock into the correct position? could you please clarify if there were any patient consequences? could you please clarify if there were any change in the post-operative care of the patient as a result of the event?.
|