|
It was reported that a cardiac perforation, pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade and blood loss occurred.The procedure was cancelled.It was reported that during a cardiac ablation procedure, a versacross connect kit for faradrive (j-wire version) was selected for use.The transseptal puncture (tsp) was completed with no issues.However, it may had been possible that the radio frequency (rf) was delivered inadvertently after the transseptal wire crossed into the left atrium.Then, a non-boston scientific mapping catheter (pentaray) was inserted, and a left atrial geometry collected with no issues.The farawave with a non-boston scientific guidewire (merit) were inserted.The team utilized a mapping system (carto) and visualization tools to be able to approximate the guide wire location fluoro-less.The left pulmonary veins were ablated without any issue, however afterwards anesthetist detected a drop in blood pressure.The operating physician did a view of the heart with intracardiac echo (ice) and immediately noticed a pericardial effusion.Immediate interventions were performed to relieve blood drainage into the pericardial space, including pericardiocentesis where several hundred cc of blood was collected.Once the effusion was greatly reduced, the patient was transferred to cardiac surgery and a sternotomy was performed.There were two small holes detected in the left atrial appendage (laa).It is unknown whether this occurred as a result of the transseptal puncture, multi-spline mapping catheter manipulation, or farawave catheter/wire manipulation.The procedure was not able to be completed due to the patient complications.The patient was held for observation and expected to recover.The device is not expected to be returned for analysis (disposed).It was further confirmed that there was a cardiac tamponade also noted.The perforation was noticed after left-sided veins ablated.No versacross device were inside patient body when pe was noted.No malfunctions were noted with the versacross devices.In the physician's opinion, it is unlikely that the versacross dilator and versacross rf wire contributed to the complication.The transseptal puncture was felt ideal by the physician, and a second tap of rf was not noticed.
|