| Model Number |
250 (+ 14 D) |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/26/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This initial emdr is being submitted to fda for an event that occurred outside of the usa.Haptic damage is indicated as a potential malfunction related to the iol, as stated under the warnings section of the product's instructions for use (ifu).250: pkg-23-021 00 en3.Ms3.150151250251.20220501(t)_15000f,15100f,25000f,25100f.Regarding section h6 - manufacturer's codes for: type of investigation, findings, and conclusion are pending completion of product investigation.Once the product investigation is completed, a follow-up report will be submitted to fda which will include the manufacturer's codes for type of investigation, findings, and conclusion.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event occurred in (b)(6).Damaged haptic after implantation.Problem code: a0401 - break; a0414 - material split, cut, or torn.Trailing haptic snapped in the injector, leading haptic and optic went into eye, lens needed to be cut into two pieces and removed.Patient health not impacted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Event occurred in united kingdom.Damaged haptic after implantation.Problem code: a0401 - break; a0414 - material split, cut, or torn.Trailing haptic snapped in the injector, leading haptic and optic went into eye, lens needed to be cut into two pieces and removed.Patient health not impacted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report #1 emdr is being submitted to fda for a reportable that occurred outside the usa.The report includes additional information not available/included in the initial report.Additional information: g6 - type of report - noted as follow-up #1.H2 - type of follow-up - noted for additional information.H6 - added codes for manufacturer's investigation: type; findings; and conclusion.The product was not returned to the manufacturer.The investigation was conducted, with the methods and results as noted below.The product was not returned and appearance check was not performed.No abnormalities were found in production and inspection records of the product.(serial no.: (b)(6); model: 250).We also confirmed there were no abnormalities on the loop pull strength test record of the material lot.(sowc-g115-09) from our investigation, we couldn't confirm the reported event.The exact root cause was not determined.However, based on the available information and our investigation, we believe this event was not caused by our product quality.A review of the most recent complaint trending data indicates that no significant trends have been identified at this time and no capa is required as part of the product evaluation.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|