|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged or unavailable.Investigation ¿ evaluation: on 22apr2024, an event involving nester platinum embolization microcoil occurred.It was reported that after the coil was placed, the user decided the placement of the coil was unsatisfactory.At this point the user attempted to remove the coil, and during this removal the coil unraveled.There were no adverse effects reported to the patient other than a prolonged time of procedure.Reviews of the documentation, including the complaint history, device history record, quality control procedures, instructions for use, as well as a visual inspection of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.Cook received just the coil, in a used condition for evaluation.Upon visual inspection, it was confirmed that the coil was unraveled.Additionally, a document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) for the device found one possible relevant recorded nonconformance that could have contributed to the reported failure mode, in which the nonconforming device was scrapped.It should be noted that there were no other complaints associated with the final product lot number.Cook also reviewed product labelling: the current instructions for use [t_nec2_rev0] state the following: ¿precautions perform an angiogram prior to embolization to determine correct catheter position." evidence gathered upon review of the dmr, ifu, and the dhr suggests that the device was not manufactured out of specification, and that there are no nonconforming devices in house or out in the field.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned product, and the results of our investigation, it was concluded that a component failure unrelated to manufacturing deficiencies contributed to the reported event.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.The appropriate personnel have been notified.Cook will continue to monitor for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.H3: device evaluated by mfg.= other (81) - device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.Device has been returned and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned or that a death or serious injury occurred; nor is it admission that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|