| Catalog Number |
0580-1-440 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
03/27/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An evaluation of the device cannot be performed as the device was not returned to the manufacturer.Should additional information become available it will be reported in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Broken exeter stem at neck/shoulder junction.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Broken exeter stem at neck/shoulder junction.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Reported event: an event regarding crack/fracture involving an exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed via clinician review of provided medical records.Method & results: -product evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned stem indicated it had fractured at the neck.Plastic surface deformation consistent with micro-motion at the stem-cement interface was observed on the surfaces of the stem.This abrasion is indicative of cyclic stress-strain ultimately leading to fatigue fracture of the stem.-clinician review: a review of the provided medical information by a clinical consultant indicated: "summary: this product inquiry concerns a 58-year-old male patient who underwent a primary right total hip arthroplasty with a cementless cup and a cemented exeter stem.The date of implant was (b)(6) 2018.The patient sustained a fracture of the exeter implant at the junction between the shoulder and the base of the femoral neck.Patient underwent explantation on (b)(6) 2024.Confirmation of event: i can confirm that the patient had a primary total hip arthroplasty as described above since i was able to see an x-ray with the implant in place with the fractured stem.I cannot confirm the explantation as i have no documentation except for a date supplied with the product inquiry.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty with the information given.The causes of fracture of a cemented femoral stem are multifactorial including surgical technique, especially in the cementing of the implant (in this case it appears to be well cemented), patient factors including the patient's bmi and activity level, and implant factors." -product history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.Conclusions: it was reported that the patient was revised due to fracture of the exeter stem.The event was confirmed by a review of the provided x-ray image by a clinical consultant: "confirmation of event: i can confirm that the patient had a primary total hip arthroplasty as described above since i was able to see an x-ray with the implant in place with the fractured stem.I cannot confirm the explantation as i have no documentation except for a date supplied with the product inquiry.Root cause analysis: the root cause of this event cannot be determined with certainty with the information given.The causes of fracture of a cemented femoral stem are multifactorial including surgical technique, especially in the cementing of the implant (in this case it appears to be well cemented), patient factors including the patient's bmi and activity level, and implant factors." no further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If devices and/or additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|