|
EXACTECH, INC. NV GXL LINR, NTRL, 36MM ID, GROUP 4 CUPS; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
130-36-54 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Mechanical Problem (1384); Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Anxiety (2328); Distress (2329); Osteolysis (2377); Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
01/15/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
D10: concomitant devices: (b)(6) 148-36-93 - 12/14 zirconia head 36mm rep by 170-36-93; (b)(6) 120-65-25 - bone screw 6.5mm dia x 25mm long; (b)(6) 164-01-13 - element-stem, collarless w/ha, std offset, sz 13; (b)(6) 186-01-62 - integrip cc, cluster 62mm, g4.H3: the revision reported was likely the result of prosthesis wear of the tibial insert.The cause of prosthesis wear is generally a combination of risk factors including, use error, implant positioning, implant size selection, and patient factors.However, this cannot be conclusively determined with the information provided.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported via legal documentation that a patient had a right total hip replacement procedure on (b)(6) 2013 and then was revised on (b)(6) 2024.Patient required revision surgery for issues including but not limited to joint pain, limited range of motion, loss of mobility, revision surgery, and other injuries presently undiagnosed which will require on going medical care.The mostly likely cause for the revision reported due to prosthesis wear is a combination of risk factors including use error, implant positioning, implant size selection, and patient factors.However, this cannot be conclusively determined with the information provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the available information, the patient meets the following risk criteria for early prosthesis wear and/or osteolysis: implanted with a lateralized liner, combination of largest available femoral head and/or thinnest available acetabular liner was used, and implanted with a component having a shelf age of greater than 2 years.The most likely cause for the reported revision due to prosthesis wear and osteolysis may have been a combination of risk factors such as use error, implant positioning, implant size selection, and patient factors (fitness for surgery, biomechanics, activity level and local tissue oxidation potential).However, this cannot be confirmed as the devices were not returned for evaluation, and images and radiographs were not provided.H6: corrected health effect, medical device, and investigation clinical codes.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|