• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3000TFX
Medical Device Problem Code Device Stenosis (4066)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dyspnea (1816); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Date of Event 04/05/2024
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported and learned through investigation that a 21mm 3000tfx aortic valve in aortic position was disabled via valve in valve procedure after an implant duration of seven (7) years, 7 months due to severe aortic stenosis.The patient presented with heart failure symptoms including dyspnea, fatigue, and lower extremity edema.Tavr was completed with a 23mm 9755rsl transcatheter valve without procedural complications.The patient was stable and was discharged on pod# 3.Per medical record, tte showed ef of 50%, bioprosthetic aortic valve with moderate to severe regurgitation, mildly elevated pulmonary pressures, mitral annular calcification, thickening, mild regurgitation and mild tricuspid valve regurgitation.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions).The device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Engineering evaluation summary: stenosis, which develops progressively over time, can be due to a number of issues.Additionally, there can be a number of potentials known and unknown patient-related contributing factors.Per technical summary 33069, rev a, structural valve deterioration (svd) is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes, occurring singularly or concomitantly, may contribute to stenosis and/or regurgitation.Alternatively, non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd) may also play a role in the development of valvular stenosis.Stenosis is most commonly related to patient factors and is not usually an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing deficiency.Devices implanted 5 years or greater with calcification, dehiscence, leaflet tears, thickened leaflet, pannus, or structural valve deterioration (stenosis, regurgitation) reported as the complaint do not require an engineering evaluation.The instructions for use (ifu) have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regard to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.The reported type of event is included in the ifu.A capa/scar/pra is not required, as there is no confirmed product, or labeling non-conformances and no other triggers are met.The most likely cause is patient factors, including hyperlipidemia (hld) and coronary artery disease (cad).All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT MAGNA PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key19212428
Report Number2015691-2024-03225
Device Sequence Number8105768
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103163643
UDI-Public(01)00690103163643(17)200212
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2016
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/31/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/12/2020
Device Model Number3000TFX
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/05/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/31/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/30/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/31/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/13/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Hospitalization;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-