| Catalog Number |
60-6085-202A |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/05/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported device is being returned to conmed for evaluation.A supplemental and final report will be filed following the completion of the device evaluation and complaint investigation.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.H3 other text : device not yet received.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported that the device, 60-6085-202a, vcare 200a - large, was being used in a robotic hysterectomy procedure on (b)(6) 2024 when it was reported, ¿broke off inside of patient balloon also fell out.They did retrieve it.¿.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, or hospitalization for the patient.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The customer reported that the device, 60-6085-202a, vcare 200a - large, was being used in a robotic hysterectomy procedure on (b)(6) 2024 when it was reported, ¿broke off inside of patient balloon also fell out.They did retrieve it.¿.There was no report of injury, medical intervention, or hospitalization for the patient.This report is being raised due to the reported malfunction with potential for injury upon reoccurrence.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Received one 60-6085-202a in opened original packaging.Lot number was verified.Performed a visual inspection, the device was returned disassembled.The balloon, cervical cup, and blue vagina cone were detached from the device.There is evidence of adhesion on the distal tip of the device where the balloon was adhered.Root cause cannot be determined, however, based upon evaluation of the device; a possible cause of this event could be excessive force.The manufacturing documents from the device history record have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of the product.The product released for distribution was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.A two-year lot history review shows a total of 3 devices for this lot number and failure mode.A two-year review of complaint history revealed there has been a total of 91 complaints, regarding 95 devices, for this device family and failure mode.During this same time frame (b)(4) devices have been manufactured and shipped worldwide.Should all the complaint devices have been found confirmed for this reported failure, the rate of failure would be (b)(4).Per the instructions for use, the user is advised the following: carefully remove the device from the vagina.Do not use excessive force to avoid traumatizing the vaginal canal.Upon removing vcare, the surgeon should visually inspect the vcare device, and the patient, to make sure that the entire vcare device was properly removed and that no components or fragments of these components were retained in the patient.We will continue to monitor for trends through the complaint system to assure patient safety.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|