• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 GLIDEPATH; DIALYSIS CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 GLIDEPATH; DIALYSIS CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5343230
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/05/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 01/2025).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a dialysis catheter placement procedure, the portion of the catheter was allegedly torn when inserting the catheter into the sheath.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 23cm glidepath d/l catheter as returned for sample evaluation.Visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluations were performed.A kink was noted proximal to the tissue cuff.The distal end of the tapper sleeve was noted to be partially lifted.The catheter was noted be torn and deformed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the reported material torn and identified deformation.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: d4 (expiration date: 01/2025), g3, h6(device).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a dialysis catheter placement procedure, the portion of the catheter was allegedly torn when inserting the catheter into the sheath.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: one 23cm glidepath d/l catheter as returned for sample evaluation.Visual, microscopic visual and functional evaluations were performed.A kink was noted proximal to the tissue cuff.The distal end of the tapper sleeve was noted to be partially lifted and deformed.Therefore, the investigation is confirmed for the identified deformation.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported fracture issue as no objective evidence found from sample evaluation results.A definitive root cause could not be determined based upon the available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a dialysis catheter placement procedure, the portion of the catheter was allegedly torn when inserting the catheter into the sheath.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GLIDEPATH
Common Device Name
DIALYSIS CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key19227060
Report Number3006260740-2024-02014
Device Sequence Number6980706
Product Code MSD
UDI-Device Identifier00801741187407
UDI-Public(01)00801741187407(11)231214(17)250131(10)REHP3013
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K051748
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/11/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2025
Device Catalogue Number5343230
Device Lot NumberREHP3013
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/05/2024
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/12/2024
12/19/2024
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/01/2024
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/22/2024
01/03/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/14/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-