|
Visual and functional analysis was performed on the returned device.The reported leak was not confirmed.Production record and corrective and preventive actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other similar complaints from this lot.It was reported that the contrast mix used in the procedure was 70% saline/ 30% contrast.It should be noted that the percutaneous transluminal angioplasty catheter (pta), armada 35 / armada 35 ll, global, instructions for use (ifu) specified that the contrast is 60% contrast medium diluted 1:1 with normal saline.In this case, since the contrast ratio used was less than the required percentage it is unknown if the ifu violation caused or contributed to the reported complaint.Based on the information reported through the complaint report, a conclusive cause for the reported leak could not be determined.Possible factors that may contribute to a leak include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, damage to the sidearm/inflation lumen, damage to the balloon or loose connections.In this case, a conclusive cause for the reported leak could not be determined since the complaint was not confirmed during analysis.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.H6 medical device problem code 2017: contrast incorrect.
|