|
|
| Model Number |
VI85 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Too Rigid or Stiff (1544)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/03/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The following sections were updated in follow-up 1: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, h3,h6, and h11.No product was provided for analysis.It was reported that the peel away mechanism did not work well, and the physician had to rely on using a hemostat to tear away the sheath from the catheter.The procedure was completed, and the patient did not experience any adverse effects, harm, or require medical intervention.Device will not be returned for evaluation, as it was disposed of.There are two different sheaths, with two different lot numbers, that were packaged into this one upn kit; it was reported it could be either of these lot numbers used in this incident (dp-18917 or dp-18918), it is unknown which lot number was involved in this incident.The device history records were reviewed for both lot numbers, to confirm the devices passed all applicable in-process and final inspections.No products were returned to oscor inc.For evaluation; however, a complaint notification was provided.Without the return of the actual devices in question for evaluation, oscor inc.Is unable to determine the exact cause for this incident.At this time, it is not possible to assign a definitive root cause for the event as reported.The complaint is non-verifiable as the product was not returned for evaluation.After management review for peeling issues, a capa was initiated to further investigate into this issue.The complaint is non-verifiable as the product was not returned for evaluation.The event will be re-evaluated should additional information becomes available.Oscor will continue to monitor this event type and risk.Oscor inc.Is submitting the above report to comply with 21 cfr part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.The report is based upon information obtained by oscor inc.Which the company may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by fda.This report does not constitute an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees, caused or contributed to the event described in this report.Nor does this report reflect a conclusion by fda, oscor inc., or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the event described in this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Customer reproted that the two lot numbers went into the one upn so it could be one of the two (dp-18917 or dp-18918).Customer is unbale to confirm the lot number, however, device history records were reviewed for both lot number,.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Conclusion not yet available, evaluation in process.A follow-up will be submitted as soon as the investigation is complete.Oscor inc.Is submitting the above report to comply with 21 cfr part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.The report is based upon information obtained by oscor inc.Which the company may not have been able to investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by fda.This report does not constitute an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees, caused or contributed to the event described in this report.Nor does this report reflect a conclusion by fda, oscor inc., or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, oscor inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the event described in this report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the peelaway mechanism did not work well and the physician had to rely on using a hemostat to tear away the sheath, from the catheter.The procedure was completed and the patient did not experience any adverse effects, harm, or require medical intervention as a result of this incident.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|