|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
H3.Product analysis: ¿ equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5); ruler (m-83361) ¿ as found condition: the pipeline flex shield was returned within the inner pouch, inside of a biohazard bag, and a shipping box.¿ visual inspection summary: the distal and proximal dps restraints were intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.The distal hypotube and ptfe shrink tubing were intact with no signs of elongation.The distal and proximal ends of the braid were opened and frayed.No bends were found with the pushwire.No defects were found with the tip coil, distal marker, re-sheathing marker, re-sheathing pad or with the proximal bumper.No other anomalies were observed.¿ conclusion: based on the returned device, the customer complaint was not confirmed, as the distal and proximal ends of the braid were fully opened and frayed.The cause of the failure to open could not be determined.Possible causes of ¿failure/incomplete open¿ include vessel tortuosity, damaged braid, or user deploying braid in vessel bend.The customer reported that the patient¿s vessel tortuosity was moderate; the pipeline flex shield was not positioned in a bend., ruling out "vessel tortuosity" as a potential cause.The damage to the braid (fraying) likely contributed to the reported event.The braid can become damaged due to resheathing more than two times, over-manipulation, deployment technique, delivering/retracting delivery wire against resistance, or deploying/resheathing the braid against resistance.However, the cause of the braid damage could not be determined.H6.Coding updated based on analysis findings.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|