|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112650 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
04/13/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.This emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device #1).An additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device #2).Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol marlex (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2009 and/or (b)(6)-2018.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: h11: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided and to correct imdrf annex d.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4, g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Corrected fields: h6 (imdrf annex d).This supplemental emdr represents the bard flat mesh (device #1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard flat mesh (device #2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text: not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of unspecified bard mesh (bard flat mesh) and bard/davol marlex (bard flat mesh) on (b)(6) 2009 and/or (b)(6) 2018.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against both devices.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2009 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿a moderate sized direct hernia defect component was identified and the sac was dissected away.A bard flat mesh (device #1) was placed and sutured." on (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿a very large hernia sac was dissected from the cord.A bard flat mesh (device #2) was secured to the pubic tubercle using sutures." on (b)(6) 2023 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent left inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted repair with the implant of synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the left inguinal hernia contained with large amount of omentum was carefully reduced and the direct pseudosac was dissected free from the direct defect.There was some scarring from previous repair.A synthetic mesh was placed and sutured.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|