| Model Number |
PV-16-40-HELIX |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/03/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Medtronic received report that a coil pushwire broke off in the instant detacher (id) during deployment of the the coil so the id was replaced; the coil detached successfully.During the same procedure, another coil was bent by the surgeon during delivery.The concerto coil was being withdrawn but detached inside the microcatheter so both the catheter and coil were withdrawn from the patient's body together.It was noted that the devices were prepared per the instructions for use (ifu) however, continuous catheter flush was not administered during the procedure.There had been friction during delivery of the coil but the surgeon had not attempted to reposition or detach the coil.The procedure was successfully completed with several other coils and no other issues reported.There was no harm or injury to the patient who was undergoing an ovarian vein embolization procedure.Patient vessel tortuosity was normal.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information was received.Vessel tortuosity was minimal.The resistance occurred in the proximal section of the catheter.The coil did come out of the introducer sheath smoothly.The operator bent the coil pusher advancing the coil and removed it once realising there was friction.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product analysis (b)(4) :equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), ruler (m-83361), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5 as found condition: the concerto device was returned for analysis within a shipping box and within a resealable plastic pouch.The unknown micro catheter used during the event was not returned for analysis.An instant detacher was also returned and will be addressed in pli-10 visual inspection/damage location details: the actuator interface was found securely attached to the coupler tube.The break indicator was found unbroken.There were no evidence of detachment attempts with an instant detacher or by manual method at these locations.The concerto pusher was found broken at 146.0cm from the proximal end with the two segments retained by the release wire (figure k).The coin and release wire were found partially retracted out of the lumen stop (figure l).The concerto implant coil was already detached from the pusher and returned within the same pouch.No damages or irregularities were found with the retainer ring.No damages or irregularities were found with the detach element stick or ball.The implant coil was found damaged (figure o).Testing/analysis: the concerto device could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in catheter¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.Possible causes for coil resistance in catheter are, but not limited to, lack of hydration before procedure, user does not maintain continuous flush, damage to the micro catheter, or tortuous anatomy.Customer reported patient vessel tortuosity as normal, devices were prepared per ifu, and continuous flush was not used.It is possible the reported lack of continuous flush contributed towards the failure.The customer report of ¿pusher break¿ and ¿premature detachment¿ were confirmed.It is possible the pusher broke during retraction due to the reported resistance, causing the coin/release wire to exit the pusher/lumen stop, detaching the device.As the unknown micro catheter used in the event was not returned for analysis, any contribution of the micro catheter towards the failures could not be determined.As the model and lot numbers were not reported, compatibility could not be determined.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|